##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

A study on the occurrence of mixed infection of tick-borne haemoparasite of cattle in selected abattoirs in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria was carried out. Blood sample were collected randomly from a total of 216 cattle slaughtered at abattoir in both dry and wet season at Wurukum abattoir, Wadata abattoir, Modern Market Abattoir, Cattle Market Abattoir North Bank, Cattle Market North Bank and University of Agriculture cattle farm, Makurdi and analyzed using Microscopic method by thin blood film. Horn method was used to determine the age of the examined cattle and the collected data was analyzed using T-test, p values at ≤ was considered statistically significant. The result showed that the rate of infection was seen to increase progressively in cattle of age 6–7 through age 10–11 with the highest prevalence recorded in age 10–11 in dry season and the lowest percentage of infection recorded in age 2–3 and cattle of age 0–1 showed the highest (27(75.00 %)) rate of infection while age 6–7 showed the lowest rate of infection in wet season. But the difference was not statistically significant (p ˂ 0.05). Male cattle recorded a non statistically significant (p ˂ 0.05) higher (53.13 %) occurrence of infection while female recorded a lower occurrence of 50.0 %.

The result of mixed infection revealed the occurrence of Bebesia, Anaplasmamaginal, Anaplasma central and Theileria. 100 % of mixed infection of Bebesia&Anaplasmamaginal and Anaplasma central and Anaplasmamaginaloccurred in West African Dwarf cattle and Sokoto gudali respectively. There was no occurrence of mixed infection of Theileria and Anaplasma central across all the examined species of cattle. White Fulani recorded mixed infection of Anaplasma central&Anaplasmamaginal, Bebesia&Anaplasma central and Bebesia&Anaplasmamaginal of 4(30.8 %), 4(30.8 %) and 5(38.5 %) percent respectively.Muturu species did not record any occurrence of mixed infection of tick borne haemoparasite.The result of the study shows that mixed infection of tick-borne haemoparasite infection are very high and common among cattle hence, preferences should be given to inspection of older male cattle and optimal management of all ruminant animals against ticks and tick-borne related infection.

References

  1. D.E. Sonenshine, Biology of Ticks. vols 1&2. New York: Oxford University Press. (2014) pp. 45-51.
     Google Scholar
  2. M. D. Salman, J. Tarrés-Call and A. Estrada-Peña, Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases: Geographical Distribution and Control Strategies in the Euro-Asia Region. CABI.(2013) pp.6–12.
     Google Scholar
  3. L. R. Stephanie,L. Ricky, S. A. Charles and W. Elizabeth, Do Tick Attachment Times Vary between Different Tick-Pathogen Systems.Journal Environments. 4, (3): (2017) 7-13.
     Google Scholar
  4. World Organization for Animal Health, Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. Paris: OIE; 2018. Bovine babesiosis. Available at: http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.04.02_BOVINE_BABESIOSIS.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  5. D. A, Hussein and L. D Singla, Diagnostic approaches for tick-borne haemoparasitic diseases in livestock. J Vet Med Anim Health. 7: (2015) 45-56.
     Google Scholar
  6. T. S. Atsuwe, E. T. Azua, V. U. Obisike and G. N. Imandeh, Comparative Study on Tick-borne Haemoparasite of Cattle and Goats Slaughtered in Some Abattoirs within Makurdi, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Life Science International; 19(4): (2019) pp 1-6
     Google Scholar
  7. H. I. Obadiah, I. E. Onah, J. U. Ugochukwu and A. K. Gbinde, Tick Infestation of Cattle in Three Markets in Makurdi, North-Central, Nigeria. American Journal of Entomology. Vol. 1, No. 1, (2017)pp. 6-10.doi: 10.11648/j.aje. 0101.12.
     Google Scholar
  8. N.M. Asmaa, M E. Bably and K.A. Shokier,“Studies on prevalence, risk factors and control options for tick infestation in ruminants,”Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences,vol.3,no.1, (2014) pp.68–73.
     Google Scholar
  9. L. F. Hitcheock, “Resistance of the cattle tick, to benzene hexachloride. Journal of Agricultural Research, 29: (1993)41–49.
     Google Scholar
  10. E. J. L.Soulsby,Helminths Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals 7th ed. London, U.K: Bailliere Tindall. (1982) P. 809.
     Google Scholar
  11. S. A. Rony, M. M. H Mondal, N. Begum, M. A. Islam and S. Affroze, Epidemiology of ectoparasitic infestations in cattle at Bhawal forest area, Gazipur. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 8 (1): (2010)27–33.
     Google Scholar
  12. K. Anderson, V.O. Ezenwa and A. E. Jolles, Tick in festation patterns in free ranging African buffalo (Syncercuscaffer):effects of host innate immunity and niche segregation among tick species. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl; 2: (2013)1–9.
     Google Scholar
  13. M. Simuunza, W. Weir, E. Courcier, A. Tait and, B. Shiels, Epidemiological analysis of tick-borne diseases in Zambia.Vet.Parasitol, 175, (2011)331–342.
     Google Scholar
  14. M. A BakheitandA. A. Latif, The innate resistance of Kenana cattle to tropical theileriosis (Theileriaannulata infection) in the Sudan. Ann NY Acad Sci;969:1 (2002)59–63.
     Google Scholar
  15. H. B. Bilgic, S. Bakirci, O. Kose, A. H. Unlu, S. Hacilarlioglu, H. Eren, W. Weir and T. Karagenc, Prevalence of tick-borne haemoparasites in small ruminants in Turkey and diagnostic sensitivity of single-PCR and RLB. Parasit Vectors,10: (2017)211.
     Google Scholar