##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The study analyzed post-harvest management practices among rice farmers in Imo State, Nigeria. This work was inspired by inadequate availability of rice in the market for the masses which reduces food security, with belief that better management processes will reduce food losses. Random sampling procedure was used in selecting 127 rice farmers and data were collected using structured questionnaire was the main tool for data collection. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive (frequency, percentages and  mean) and  inferential statistics. Farmers identified delay in harvesting (98.42%), lack of technical knowledge (95.27%), dependency on traditional threshing methods (94.48%), incomplete threshing (91.30%), improper handling operations (81.10%) as one of the various causes of post harvest losses in their rice production and processing in the study area. The post harvest management practices adopted by the farmers were as cutting the rice stalk (98.42%), reaping the panicles (94.48%), laying out the paddy-on-stalk (93.70%), stacking it to dry (92.12%) and stacking it to dry recording (89.76%). The result from the multiple regression analysis showed that age, educational level, membership of cooperative, household size, farming experience, household size, farming experience and access to credit were found to have significantly influenced on the number of post harvests management practiced by farmers. Similarly, the farmers were also able to identify various constraints to post harvest management as lack of awareness of good post harvest practices and technology, inadequate machinery, lack of incentives to store rice It was therefore recommended that extension agents should be encouraged to increase their campaign on post harvest management practices of rice and organize more training on minimization of post harvest losses on rice.

Key words: Rice, post harvest losses, post harvest practices, post harvest management.

 

References

  1. O. Agada and B.E. Ijih, “Analysis of Post Harvest Management Practices among Farmers in Oju, Benue State, Nigeria”. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 8(1), 2019.
     Google Scholar
  2. H.O. Akaeze, “Consumer Preference for Imported Rice in Nigeria, Perceived quality, differences or habit persistence”. M.Sc thesis, Michigan State University, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  3. S. Ayado, “ Discordant tunes over Yam Export Policy in Nigeria”. Article Published in the Leadership Newspaper 19th June, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  4. C, Chukwunta, “An Analysis of Post Harvest Losses Management Strategies by Farmers in Awgu Local Government Area of Enugu State Nigeria”. University of Nigeria, Nsukka, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  5. N. Danbaba, P.Y. Idakwo, A.L.Kassum, C. Bristone, S.O. Bakare, U. Aliyu, I.N. Kolo, M.E. Abo, A. Mohammed, A.N. Abdulkadir, I. Nkama, M.H. Badau, M.A. Kabaraini, H. Shehu, A.O. Abosede and M.K.Danbaba, “Rice Postharvest Technology in Nigeria: An Overview of Current Status, Constraints and Potentials for Sustainable Development”, 2015. Open Access Library Journal, 6: e5509.https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105509
     Google Scholar
  6. C.C. Eze, B. Amanze, and O. Nkwankwo, “Resource Use Efficiency in Arable Crop production among Small Holder Farmers in Owerri Agricultural Zone of Imo State, Nigeria”. Research 2(5) pp 14–20, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  7. Food and Agricultural Organisation, Global Food Losses and Food Waste-Extent, Causes and Prevention. Rome, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  8. J.A. Folayan, “Determinants of Post Harvest Losses of Maize in Akure North Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria”. Journal of Sustainable Society 2(1), 2013: 2168-2585.
     Google Scholar
  9. Growth and Employment in States, Mapping of Rice Production Clusters in Nigeria. A Project Report on Growth and Employment in States by the United Kingdom Department of International Development (DFID) in Nigeria, 66, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  10. R. Guise, Post Harvest Losses of Rice (Oriza Spp) from Harvesting to Milling: A Case Study in Besease and Nobewam in The Ejisu Juabeng District in the Ashanti Region Of Ghana, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  11. L, Kitinoja, and J.R. Gorny, Post harvest technologies for small scale horticultural farmers and marketers: economic opportunistic, quality and food safety. University of California post harvest horticultural series. No. 21, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  12. R.P. Marvin, K.K. Prasanta and D.R. Kent, “Postharvest losses due to Harvesting Operations in Developing Countries”: A review of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting Held at New Orleans, United States, Published by American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 1(1): 562-596, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  13. Nigerian Population Commission, Nigerian Federal Government Initiative of individual Head Count. Spread, State by State, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  14. J.C. Norman, and B. Kebe, African Smallholder Farmers: Rice Production and Sustainable Livelihoods. International Rice Commission Newsletter (FAO), 55: 33-44, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  15. A.E. Oguntade, D. Thyimann, and S. Deimling, “Postharvest Losses of Rice in Nigeria and their Ecological Foot Print”. Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internatinale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), German Food Partnership/Competitive African Rice Initiative (CARI), 51, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  16. West African Rice Development Association, Rice, a Strategic Crop for Food Security and Poverty Alleviation, 2015. Available from www2.slu.se/cigar/CGIAR_WARDAppt.
     Google Scholar