Comparative Karyomorphological Analysis of In vivo and In vitro Grown Plants of Plumbago zeylanica: An Important Medicinal Plant
Article Main Content
The present report describes the comparative cytological analysis of in vivo and in vitro grown plant species of Plumbago zeylanica. Somatic chromosome number of in vivo and micro-propagated plants was confirmed to be 2n=28. Individual chromosome length of mother plant and micro-propagated plant was ranged from 2.26 to 5.54 µm and 2.26 to 5.46 µm, respectively. The total length of the haploid complement of in vivo and in vitro grown plants was 49.35 and 52.98 µm. The total form percent (TF%) of mother and in vitro grown plants was 45.11% and 45.58%, respectively and according to Stebbins classification (1971) both plants karyotype was fell into 2B symmetric type. The centromeric formula was for in vivo and in vitro grown plants were 3sm + 11m.
References
-
Aikpokpodion, O.P., Out, A.P., & Uyoh, A.E. (2012). Karyotype analysis and ploidy determination using flow cytometry in African bitter milk plant “Utazi”, Gongronema latifolium Benth. Cytologia, 77(1), 43-52.
Google Scholar
1
-
Bhadra,S., & Bandyopadhyay, M. (2015). Investigations on some economically important members of Zingiberaceae from Eastern India. International Journal of Cytology, Cytosystematics and Cytogenetics, 68(3), 184-192.
Google Scholar
2
-
Chetty, K.M., Sivaji, K., Sudarsanam, G., & Hindu, S.P. (2006). Pharmaceutical studies and therapeutic uses of Plumbago zeylanica Roots. Ethnobotanical Leaflets, 10, 294-304.
Google Scholar
3
-
Chaudhari, K.A., & Chaudhary, R.B. (2012). Meiotic chromosome behaviour and karyomorphology of Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. Chromosome Botany, 7, 23-29.
Google Scholar
4
-
Ghani, A. (2003). Medicinal plant of Bangladesh with chemical constitutions and uses. 2nd ed. Asiatic society of Bangladesh, Dhaka. pp. 66-434.
Google Scholar
5
-
Huziwara, Y. (1962). Karyotypic analysis in some genera of compositae VIII. Further studies on the chromosomes of Aster. American Journal of Botany, 49, 116-119.
Google Scholar
6
-
Kapoor, L.D. (1990). Handbook of Ayurvedic Medicinal plants. CRC Press, London.
Google Scholar
7
-
Kumar, V., Parvatam, G., & Ravishankar, G.A. (2009). AgNO3 – A potential regulator of ethylene activity and plant growth modulator. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 12, 1-15.
Google Scholar
8
-
Larkin, P., & Scowcroft, W.R. (1981). Somaclonal variation—A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 60(4), 197-214.
Google Scholar
9
-
Levan, A., Fredga, K., & Sandberg, A.A. (1964). Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas, 52, 201-220.
Google Scholar
10
-
Mia, M.M.K. (1990). In Ghani A (ed.) Traditional medicine, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka. pp. 73.
Google Scholar
11
-
Samadder, T., Nath, S., Halder, M., Sil, B., Roychowdhury, D., & Sen, S. (2012). Karyotype analysis of three important traditional Indian medicinal plants Bacopa monnieri, Tylophora indica, and Withania somnifera. Nucleus, 55(1), 17-20.
Google Scholar
12
-
Stebbins, G.L. 1958. Longevity, habitat and release of genetic variability in higher plants. Cold Spring. Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 23: 365-377.
Google Scholar
13
-
Yusuf, M., Begum, J., Hoque, M.N., & Chowdhury, J.U. (2009). Medicinal plants of Bangladesh (Revised and enlarged), Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR) Laboratories, Chittagong, Bangladesh. p.794.
Google Scholar
14
-
Zhou,Q., Zhou, J., Chen, J., &Wang, X. (2009). Karyotype analysis of medicinal plant Liriope spicata var. prolifera (Liliaceae). Biologia, 64(4), 680-683.
Google Scholar
15