Research Article

Effects of Shoot Apex Removal on Growth and Yield Attributes of Cotton

Z. A. Awan
World Wild Fund for Nature (WWF), Pakistan
* Corresponding author
M. Saleem
World Wild Fund for Nature (WWF), Pakistan
L. A. Khan
World Wild Fund for Nature (WWF), Pakistan
A. U. Imran
World Wild Fund for Nature (WWF), Pakistan
DOI icon 10.24018/ejbio.2022.3.2.334

Read Counter
494

Downloads
478

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2022-01-28
Published 2022-03-02

Read counter = 494 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

The current study was designed to investigate the effect of shoot apex removal on the growth and yield attributes of the cotton crop. A field experiment was conducted in the cotton-growing season (2020-2021) at Muzaffargarh, district of South Punjab. The field trial was comprised of two acres of land where one acre of land was considered as treatment (cotton plants with shoot apex removal) and the other acre of land served as a control plot (cotton plants without shoot apex removal). The data were collected fortnightly (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th times) from the randomly selected cotton plants (n=50) from the treated and control plot after fifteen days of treatment (shoot apex removal). The data were comprised of vegetative parameters (i.e., plant height, no. of nodes and leaves), reproductive parameters (i.e., no. of squares, flowers, immature/mature bolls, the opening of bolls and boll weight) and cotton fiber quality parameters [i.e., fiber length, strength, finesse and GOT (ginning outturn)]. Descriptive analysis was employed on all data recorded through an independent two-sample t-test to evaluate the positive effect of shoot apex removal in cotton production. Our results indicated that after removing the top shoot of the cotton plants, greater effects had started to occur in the treated plants such as vegetative growth had become significantly (at p≤0.001) slow down and reproductive growth considerably (at p≤0.01) enhanced. Besides, removal of the shoot apex in cotton plants has developed resistance against the sucking pest i.e., pink bollworm infestation significantly reduced by 50% and whitefly population has lessened by 11%. The results also indicated that this treatment significantly augmented (at p≤0.01) the boll weight by 12%, as well as improved the cotton fiber length, strength and fineness by 7% as compared to the normal cotton plant. It was concluded that shoot apex removal caused cotton plants to produce numerous lateral shoots to develop more branches to carry more cotton bolls on them eventually significantly enhancing the cotton yield by 13% (18 monds acre-1) as compared to the control plot. It can be suggested that the practical implementation of removing the shoot apex of the cotton plant would act as a promising technique to enhance the cotton yield.

Keywords: Gossypium hirsutum, Muzaffargarh, shoot apex, quality, yield

References

  1. Zhang, X., Zhang, Z., Zhou, R., Wang, Q., & Wang, L. (2020). Ratooning annual cotton (Gossypium spp.) for perennial utilization of heterosis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 1939.
     Google Scholar
  2. Ullah, A., Ashfaq, M., Asif, S., Naqvi, A., Adil, S. A., & Hassan, S. (2017). Impact of Better Management Practices (BMPS) on sustainability of cotton production in Punjab. Pakistan. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Science, 7, 144-149.
     Google Scholar
  3. Egbuta, M. A., McIntosh, S., Waters, D. L., Vancov, T., & Liu, L. (2017). Biological importance of cotton by-products relative to chemical constituents of the cotton plant. Molecules, 22(1), 93
     Google Scholar
  4. Rehman, A., Jingdong, L., Chandio, A. A., Hussain, I., Wagan, S. A., & Memon, Q. U. A. (2019). Economic perspectives of cotton crop in Pakistan: A time series analysis (1970–2015) (Part 1). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 18(1), 49-54.
     Google Scholar
  5. Rana, A. W., Ejaz, A., & Shikoh, S. H. (2020). Cotton crop: A situational analysis of Pakistan. International Food Policy Research Institute.
     Google Scholar
  6. Lampridi, M. G., Sørensen, C. G., & Bochtis, D. (2019). Agricultural sustainability: A review of concepts and methods. Sustainability, 11(18), 5120.
     Google Scholar
  7. Razzaq, A., Zafar, M. M., Ali, A., Hafeez, A., Batool, W., Shi, Y., et al. (2021). Cotton germplasm improvement and progress in Pakistan. Journal of Cotton Research, 4(1), 1-14.
     Google Scholar
  8. Wien, H. C. (2016). Pinching ornamental sunflowers increases cut stem yield and reduces flower size. HortTechnology, 26(6), 762-766.
     Google Scholar
  9. Müller, D., & Leyser, O. (2011). Auxin, cytokinin and the control of shoot branching. Annals of Botany, 107(7), 1203-1212.
     Google Scholar
  10. Ali, S., Basit, A., Khattak, A. M., Shah, S. T., Ullah, I., Khan, N. A., et al. (2021). Managing the growth and flower production of Zinnia (Zinnia elegans) through Benzyle Amino Purine (BAP) Application and Pinching. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 34(1), 29-40.
     Google Scholar
  11. Baskaran, V., & Abirami, K. (2017). Effect of pinching on yield of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cv. Pusa Narangi Gainda under Andaman conditions. Agricultural Science Digest-A Research Journal, 37(2), 148-150.
     Google Scholar
  12. Khan, L. A., Awan, Z. A., Imran, A. U., Saleem, M., Sufyan, F., & Azmat, M. (2021). The Impact of Better Management Practices (BMPs) among cotton farmers in Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Science, 13(7), 74-88.
     Google Scholar
  13. Sunitha, H. M., Hunje, R., Vyakaranahal, B. S., & Bablad, H. B. (2007). Effect of pinching and growth regulators on plant growth, flowering and seed yield in African marigold (Tagetes erecta Linn.). Journal of ornamental Horticulture, 10(2), 91-95.
     Google Scholar
  14. Ferguson, B. J., & Beveridge, C. A. (2009). Roles for auxin, cytokinin, and strigolactone in regulating shoot branching. Plant physiology, 149(4), 1929-1944.
     Google Scholar
  15. Ohta, K., & Ikeda, D. (2016). Effects of pinching treatment on harvest term and plant growth in processing tomato. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 97(1), 92-98.
     Google Scholar
  16. Bazargani, M. M., Tabatabaei, B. E. S., & Omidi, M. (2011). Multiple shoot regeneration of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) via shoot apex culture system. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(11), 2005-2011.
     Google Scholar
  17. Habiba, S. U., Islam, M. S., & Uddin, A. J. (2012). Influence of terminal bud pinching on growth and yield of chrysanthemum, Chrysanthemum indicum L. Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, 36(2), 251-255.
     Google Scholar
  18. Ona, A. F., Roni, M. Z. K., Ahmad, H., Jui, N. J., & Uddin, A. F. M. J. (2015). Study on growth and flower yield of five snowball varieties. Bangladesh Research Publication Journal, 11(3), 182-186.
     Google Scholar
  19. Sharaf-Eldien, M. N., El-Bably, S. Z., & Magouz, M. R. (2017). Effect of pinching and spraying of paclobutrazol on vegetative growth, flowering and chemical composition of Zinnia elegans, Jacq. Journal of Plant Production, 8(5), 587-592.
     Google Scholar
  20. Xi, X. Y., Li, C. J., & Zhang, F. S. (2005). Nitrogen supply after removing the shoot apex increases the nicotine concentration and nitrogen content of tobacco plants. Annals of botany, 96(5), 793-797.
     Google Scholar
  21. Pandey, M., Subedi, S., Khanal, P., Chaudhary, P., Adhikari, A., Sharma, T. P., et al. (2021). Effects of different rates of nitrogen and pinching on yield and yield attributes of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4(2), 21-28.
     Google Scholar
  22. Vani, K. P., Rekha B. K. & Nalini N. (2021). Yield and nutrient uptake of Bt cotton as influenced by composted waste, organic and inorganic fertilizers. Chemical Science Review and Letters, 9 (34), 432-441.
     Google Scholar
  23. Swapna, M., & Singh, P. K. (2008). Shoot apex development at various stages of flowering in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid). Cytologia, 73(2), 173-177.
     Google Scholar
  24. Ohta, K. (2017). Branch formation and yield by flower bud or shoot removal in tomato. Physical Methods for Stimulation of Plant and Mushroom Development, 35-51.
     Google Scholar
  25. Mohanty, C. R., Mohanty, A., & Parhi, R. (2015). Effect of planting dates and pinching on growth and flowering in African marigold cv. SIRAKOLE. Asian Journal of Horticulture, 10(1), 95-99.
     Google Scholar
  26. Sarkar, D., Saud, B. K., Mahanta, P., Kalita, P., Neog, B., & Talukdar, M. C. (2018). Response of pinching and gibberellic acid on growth and physiological characteristics of African marigold. International Journal of Current Microbiology in Applied Science, 7(3), 1666-1672.
     Google Scholar