Chemical and Microbiological Quality of Municipal Supply Water in Dhaka South Area, Bangladesh
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
This project aimed to find out the microbiological quality of municipal supply water in Dhaka South area and if the current regime of microbiological quality testing can determine the risk to public health from supply water satisfactorily. Water samples were collected from six different points of the water distribution network of Dhaka’s south locality, starting from the source (Shitalakhyariver, Narayanganj) to Jagannath University, Dhaka. The dominant taxonomic units were isolated using standard culture techniques, followed by biochemical identification, VITEK2 identification, and biofilm-forming potential of each isolate individually and co-cultured with other isolates. Presumptive identification of isolates from the Shitalakhya River revealed the presence of Citrobacter sp., Alcaligenes sp., and Pseudomonas putida. The sample from Saydabad Water Treatment Plant yielded Vibrio mimicus, Pseudomonas fluorescence, and Alcalimonas. The major aerobic bacteria in the water specimen from the community overhead tank included S aureus, Bacillus cereus, Micrococcus sp., Enterococcus sp., Lactococcus sp. Tap water revealed the presence of Escherichia coli, Lactococcus, Enterobacter, Shigella, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, and Staphylococcus aureus, as well as anaerobic bacteria. Biochemical tests and VITEK2 yielded different results. Potential biofilm formers such as Klebsiella, E. coli, Enterococcus, Aerococcus, Enterobacter, and Cronobacter indicated quality deterioration potential inside the piped water supply system. Alteration in the major taxonomic units throughout the municipal water distribution network and the presence of opportunistic pathogens and biofilm-formers indicate the necessity for an updated water treatment, quality control, and in-line maintenance system.
Introduction
Access to safe drinking water is one of the most basic universal rights and is included in the “sustainable development goals” (SDG 2030) by the United Nations (UN) (Aroraet al., 2018). A low- and middle-income country like Bangladesh must adhere to SDG 2030 to improve the quality of life for citizens. Bangladesh is a tropical country boasting a population of 170 million people. Rapid urbanization and repeated natural disasters pose challenges to attaining SDGs in Bangladesh.
Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, has a population of 20 million people, 83% of whom have access to municipal supply water provided by Dhaka Water Supply and Sewage Authority (DWASA), an agency under the Ministry of Local Government Engineering Department. Dhaka city is divided into 2 municipal areas (Dhaka North and Dhaka South). Dhaka South City has a water supply network established in 1936. This infrastructure acquires natural water from the Shitalakhya River, treats it with chlorination at the Saidabad Water Treatment Plant (WTP), and pumps it to community water pumps, from which it flows to neighborhood overhead tanks. Points-of-uses get municipal water from overhead tanks through the underground piped network. The piped water supply networks were constructed 80 years ago (Khan, 2016), and the microbiological safety test protocol for municipal supply water has been in effect since the 1970s (Baileyet al., 2021). At the moment, DWASA and the Department of Public Health Engineering of the Government of Bangladesh perform routine tests of municipal supply water based on cultural detection of fecal indicator organisms only (Baileyet al., 2021). Public health microbiologists have discovered many microbiological risk factors in supply water to households that were not included in standard protocols in the 1970s, such as opportunistic pathogens, fungi, viruses, parasites, chlorine-resistant pathogens, and biofilm-forming consortia (Edberg, 2000). Microbiological safety and quality assessment of protocol of DWASA was set in 1970s and update is needed to include the emerging risk factors suggested by the World Health Organization (Ahmed, 2021) such as opportunistic pathogens, fungi, viruses, parasites, chlorine-resistant pathogens, biofilm-forming consortia (Edberg, 2000). Biofilms are extremely difficult to remove from the distribution system once they are established, and they can be resistant to disinfectants (Zottola & Sasahara, 1994). Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Legionella, Naegleria, and Mycobacterium spp. are most concerned pathogen that can cause water borne diseases (Zottola & Sasahara, 1994). Ensuring safe drinking water is one of the universal sustainable development ological safety of municipal supply drinking water cannot be ensured without the adoption of modern molecular microbiological safety assays of supply water because culture-based techniques leave out potential pathogens that are either human pathogens or are precursors of deterioration of the quality of drinking water (Bitton, 2014). This report analyses municipal supply water from different locations within the DWASA water acquisition, treatment, and supply system located in Dhaka South area with culture-based as well as VITEK2-based techniques, comparison of culture-based vs. VITEK2-based microbiological reports and risks from biofilm-forming bacteria within the water-supply piped network to stress the requirement to update and revise microbiological test procedure in Bangladesh to make the municipal water safer and better.
The aim of this article was to investigate the physico-chemical and microbiological risk factors present in municipal supply water that could be overlooked by DWASA’s routine test. The objective was to collect water samples from 6 different points from the water sample network (the source, the treatment plant, the pumping station, the overhead tank, the underground reservoir, and the point-of-use tap), compare microbiological qualities of water samples with culture-based analysis vs. VITEK2 based analysis and assess biofilm-forming potential-based analysis that indicates biofouling-forming potential of bacteria present in supply water.
Methods
Sample Collection Process
Water samples were collected from six different locations of the municipal water distribution point of Dhaka WASA. All the samples were collected at regular intervals over a period of five months, from March 2018 to August 2018. Samples were taken to the laboratory within 1 hour for further analysis (Guardabassiet al., 1998). Sample collection activities were done with sterile sampling glass bottles, sample collectors, alcohol thermometers, and ice boxes. The samples were collected with gloved hand and marked immediately after collection with care. The samples were maintained at a cool temperature in a sampling box containing an Ice pack until the samples were taken to the laboratory.
Location and Type of Samples
A total of 6 samples were collected in triplicates from 6 different sites of the water supply system of DWASA (Fig. 1, Table I).
# SI of samling location | Points in the water distribution system | Sites of sample collection |
---|---|---|
1 | Surface water source | Shitalakhya river, Narayanganj |
2 | Water treatment plant | Pagla Water treatment plant, Jatrabari, Dhaka |
3 | Community water pumps | Jatrabari pump |
4 | Community overhead tanks | Laxmibazar tank, Sadarghat |
5 | Underground reservoir in receiving ends | Undergound reservoir of Jagannath University |
6 | Taps at points of use | Tap at the Laboratory 1 |
Department of Microbiology, Jagannath University, Dhaka |
The sampling locations are given below:
- Point 1: Source of surface water from Shitalakhya River.
- Point 2: Jatrabari water supply pump.
- Point 3: Lakshmi Bazar Overhead Tank, which was the nearest tank of Jagannath University.
- Point 4: Overhead tank of Jagannath University, which is situated at the roof of building of Jagannath University.
- Point 5: Underground reservoir in Jagannath University.
- Point 6: the tap water of the Laboratory of the Department of Microbiology, Jagannath University.
Processing of Samples
Approximately 200 ml of water was collected using a sterile reagent bottle tightly wrapped with sterile aluminum foil for the collection of each sample. Tenfold serial dilutions of samples were prepared in physiological saline, and 0.1 ml aliquots were pour-plated on each of the culture media described in the culture media section for the isolation of bacterial colonies.
Culture Media
The following culture media were used for the isolation of waterborne bacterial species: Nutrient agar for total viable count (TVC), McConkey agar for the enteric pathogen, Mannitol salt agar (MSA) for Staphylococcus, membrane fecal coliform agar (mFC) for fecal coliforms, Cetrimide agar for Pseudomonas and Xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) for Salmonella and Shigella, thiosulfate citrate bile salt agar (TCBS) for Vibrio and Eosine methylene blue (EMB) agar for E. coli. The findings are presented in Table II.
#SI of sampling sites | Different points of sample collection | Total Heterotrophic Count (THC) (CFU/ml) found in this study | Reference values for acceptable limits of total heterotrophic count for municipal supply water | Number of isolates |
---|---|---|---|---|
(DPHE, 2016) | ||||
1 | Shitalakhya river | 1.69 × 104 | Not specified | 6 |
2 | Water treatment plant | 4.5 × 104 | 7 × 105 CFU/ml | 5 |
3 | Jatrabari water pump | 7.05 × 105 | Not specified | 5 |
4 | Laxmibazar water tank | 5.23 × 105 | Not specified | 6 |
5 | Jagannath University underground tank | 2 × 108 | Not specified | 6 |
6 | Department of Microbiology, | 4 × 104 | 3.4 × 106 CFU/ml | 6 |
Jagannath University tap water |
Biochemical Tests Methods
The following biochemical media were used for biochemical profiling: Kligler’s Iron Agar (KIA) was used for carbohydrate metabolism, citrate agar for citrate utilization, motility indole agar (MIU) for urease production, indole production and motility, methyl red- Voges-Proskeur media for mixed and volatile acid production, nitrate broth for nitrate reduction, which is presented in Table III.
ID | VITEK2 Identification | Biochemical identification | Source |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Unidentified | Citrobacter | Shitalakhya river |
2 | Enterobacter aerogenes | E. coli | Shitalakhya river |
3 | Enterobacter aerogenes | Unidentified | Shitalakhya river |
4 | Klebsiella pneumonia subsp. pneumonia | Enterobacter aerogenes | Shitalakhya river |
5 | Escherichia coli | Unidentified | Jatrabari water pump |
6 | Cronobacter dublinensis Subsp. dublinensis | Unidentified | Jatrabari water pump |
7 | Staphylococcus lentis | Unidentified | Jatrabari water pump |
8 | Aerococcus viridians | Unidentified | Laxmibazar water tank |
9 | Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. dublinensis | Unidentified | Laxmibazar water tank |
10 | Enterobacter aerogenes | Enterococcus faecalis | Laxmibazar water tank |
11 | Escherichia coli | Unidentified | Laxmibazar water tank |
12 | Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lactaridi | Micrococcus luteus | Overhead tank |
13 | Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. faecalis | Bacillus enobaticus | Overhead tank |
14 | Staphylococcus lentus | Unidentified | Tapwater |
15 | Unidentified | Shigella dysenteriae | Tapwater |
16 | Kocuria kristinae | Alcaligenes faecalis | Tapwater |
17 | Unidentified | Vibrio mimicus | Tapwater |
18 | Micrococcus luteus | Streptococcus pyogenes | Tapwater |
VITEK2 Identification System
The VITEK2 is an automated bacterial identification system utilizing growth-based technology (Biomereux Inc. France). It focuses on the industrial microbiology-testing environment to identify spore-forming Gram-positive bacilli (i.e., Bacillus and related genera). The other colorimetric reagent cards (GN, GP, YST) apply to all system formats for both industrial and clinical laboratories, results are presented in Table III.
Biofilm Assay
Isolates were grown overnight in Luria Broth. The overnight culture was diluted 1:100 with fresh medium into microtiter plates for biofilm assay. A standard biofilm assay medium M63 was supplemented with magnesium sulfate, glucose, and casamino acids. We used triplicate wells for each treatment. After overnight incubation, 125 microliters of 0.1% solution of crystal violet were added in water to each well of the microtiter plate and shaken at room temperature for 10–15 min. The absorbance of individual wells in a plate was quantified with an ELISA reader at 550 nm using 30% acetic acid in water as the blank, which is seen in Table IV.
ID | Isolate | Biofilm-forming potential | Synergistic Biofilm formation with isolates from same sample |
---|---|---|---|
2 | Enterobacter aerogenes | Yes | Aerococcus viridans |
3 | Enterobacter aerogenes | No | None |
6 | Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae | Yes | Escherichia coli |
7 | Escherichia coli | Yes | Klebsiella pneumoniae |
Sub sp. Pneumoniae | |||
10 | Cronobacter dublinenesis str. lausannensis | No | None |
11 | Staphylococcus lentus | Yes | Aerococcus viridans |
13 | Cronobacter dublinenesis subsp. Dublinenesis | No | Enterobacter aerogenes, |
Escherichia coli, | |||
Cronobacter dublinenesis | |||
str.lactaridi | |||
15 | Enterobacter aerogenes | No | None |
17 | Escherichia coli | No | None |
18 | Cronobacter dublinenesis str. lactaridi | Yes | Enterobacter aerogenes, |
Escherichia coli, | |||
Cronobacter dublinenesis | |||
Sub sp. Dublinensis | |||
20 | Alcaligenes faecalis | No | None |
21 | Staphylococcus lentus | Yes | None |
25 | Kocuria kristinae | Yes | None |
29 | Micrococcus luteus | Yes | None |
Finally, the physico-chemical parameters of the water samples were measured with automated probes, such as pH meter (Infitek, USA), conductivity meter (Infitek, USA), alkalimeter (Gaotech, South Korea), Dissoved oxygen sensor (Gaotech, South Korea). Biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were measured with a 5-day in-house BOD/ COD assay protocol (EPA Standards 5210/5220). Total Nitrogen (TN) was measured with Kjeldahl method (EPA standards 351.2). Total Organic Carbon (TOC), arsenic, iron, sulphur, phosphorous, and lead were measured with methods described in the Handbook of the American Public Health Association (1992) with the help of Bangladesh Council Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR).
Results
The Total Heterotrophic Count (THC) rate is different in different sites of the water body. In the Shitalakhya river, from where the raw water is being collected by Dhaka WASA, the THC value is 1.69 × 104 CFU/ml. The THC value of Jatrabari water pump is different from the THC value of Shitalakhya river. The THC range of Jatrabari water pump is 7 × 105 CFU/ml to 2 × 108 CFU/ml. The THC value of the Laxibazar Overhead tank is 2.4 × 108 CFU/ml, which is different from both the Shitalakhya River and the Jatrabari water pump. Lastly, the tap water at point-of-use is also different from all the sites of the water body. The THC value in the tap water supplied by Dhaka WASA is 2.3 × 108 CFU/ml where the reference value is 3.5 × 108 CFU/ml (Table II).
Various bacterial taxonomic units were from different points of Dhaka WASA distribution network (Table III). In the Shitalakhya River, 6 genera were isolated. Among them, 4 were Gram-positive bacteria and 2 Gram-negative (Citrobacter, Alcaligenes) bacteria. In the Jatrabari water pump, a total of 8 isolates were identified: 6 Gram-positive bacteria and 2 Gram-negative bacteria. The Gram-negative bacteria were identified as Pseudomonas and Vibrio. A total of 6 Genera were isolated from the Laxmibazar Overhead tank. Among them, 4 were Gram-positive (S. aureus, Bacillus, Micrococcus, Enterococcus), and 2 were Gram-negative bacteria (Morgan, 1988).
In the Jagannath University reservoir, a total of 6 Genera were identified, where 3 were Gram-positive (Listeria, Lactococcus, and Enterobacter) and the remaining 3 were Gram-negative bacteria. A total of 5 Genera were identified in the tap water at point-of-use: 2 Gram-positive (Staphylococcus, Streptococcus) and 3 Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli, Shigella, and Klebsiella) Percival (1999).
Resistant microbes can survive chlorination and establish complex biofilms inside the supply pipes, deteriorating the quality of supply waters. As evident from Table II, the organisms that establish biofilms successfully inside a municipal distribution system range from pathogens (Aeromonas hydrophila, Salmonella, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Legionella pneumophila, E coli), opportunists (Stenotrophomonas moltophilia, Mycobacterium avis complex), toxin producers (Cyanobacteria) to non-pathogens that destroy the pipe material and cause biofouling (Galleonella, Siderooxydans, Geothrix, Nitrospira). The reports from temperate weather show enrichment of molds in the biofilm (Penicillium, Alternaria, Fusarium, Aspergillus, Mucor, Geotrichum, Botrytis) (Hurtado-McCormicket al., 2016). The physico-chemical parameters from water supplied by Dhaka WASA were tested at the Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR) (Table V).
Parameter | Tap water | Reference value of WHO | Reference value for Bangladesh | Method |
---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 7.5 | 7 | 6.5–8.5 | pH meter |
Conductivity | 622 μS/cm | 100 μS/cm | 500 μS/cm | Conductivity meter |
Alkalinity | 0 | 0 | 0 | Alkalimetry |
TDS | 210 NTU | 0 | 100 NTU | TDS meter |
Salinity | 230 mg/L | 100 mg/L | 200 mg/L | EC meter |
Hardness | 101 mh/L | 75 mh/L | 75 mh/L | CaCO3 |
BOD | 0.14 mg/L | 0 | 0.03 mg/L | In-house 5 day |
DO | 7.61 mg/L | 0 | 20 mg/L | DO sensor |
COD | 3 mg/L | 0 | 4 mg/L | In-house 5 day |
TOC | 12.19 mg/L | 0 | 0.2 mg/L | APHA 5310B |
TN | <5 mg/L | 0 | 1 mg/L | Kjeldahl |
Arsenic | <0.005 mg/L | 0.01 mg/L | 0.05 mg/L | APHA 3114C |
Iron | 0.62 mg/L | 0 | 0.004 mg/L | APHA 3111B |
Sulphate | 0.4 mg/L | 0 | 400 mg/L | APHA4100B |
Phosphorus | 0.5 mg/L | 0 | 6 mg/L | APHA 4500PB |
Lead | 0.012 mg/L | 0 | 0 | APHA 3111B |
The pH value of the tap water supplied by Dhaka WASA is 7.5, the reference value of WHO is 7, and the reference value for Bangladesh is 6.5–8.5. The conductivity of the tap water from Dhaka WASA is found to be much higher than the reference value of WHO and Bangladesh. The conductivity level of the tap is 622 μS/cm, where the reference value of WHO and Bangladesh is 100 μS/cm and 500 μS/cm, respectively. No alkalinity is found on the tap water supplied by Dhaka WASA. The alkalinity is 0, where the reference value of WHO and Bangladesh is also 0. An increased level of Total Dissolved Solid (TDS) is found in the tap water of Dhaka WASA. The TDS value is 210 NTU. According to the reference of WHO, the TDS value should be 0, and the perspective of Bangladesh, the value is 100 NTU. An increased rate of salinity is also found in the tap water of Dhaka WASA. The salinity of tap water is 230 mg/L. The reference value of WHO is 100 mg/L, and the reference value for Bangladesh is 200 mg/L. EC meter is used for salinity test. The hardness of the water supplied by Dhaka WASA is 100 mh/L, but the reference value of WHO and for Bangladesh is 75 mh/L. The Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) rate is also higher in the tap water of Dhaka WASA (Md. Sirajul Islamet al., 2020). The BOD rate of the tap water is 0.14 mg/L, which is higher than the preference rate of WHO and Bangladesh. The reference BOD value of WHO is 0, and for Bangladesh, the value is 0.03 mg/L. The dissolved Oxygen rate of the tap water is 7.61 mg/L, where the reference value of WHO is 0, and the reference value for Bangladesh is 20 mg/L. Dissolve Oxygen is being tested by DO sensor. In the case of Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), the rate found in the COD level in the tap water of Dhaka WASA is 3 mg/L, where the WHO level is 0, and for Bangladesh, the reference value is 4 mg/L. Like BOD, the COD test also takes 5 days.
In the case of Total Organic Compound (TOC), increased rate is being found in TOC level like BOD in the tap water of Dhaka WASA. 12.19 mg/L is found in the tap water, where the reference value for Bangladesh and WHO are 0.2 mg/L and 0, respectively. TN value is below 5 mg/L where the WHO value is 0, and for Bangladesh, the value is 1 mg/L. Arsenic value found in the tap water is below 0.005 mg/L. The maximum tolerance value according to WHO is 0.01 mg/L, and for Bangladesh, it is 0.05 mg/L. Increased Iron level is being found in the tap water of Dhaka WASA. The rate of Iron is 0.62 mg/L. According to the reference of WHO, the maximum value of Iron should be 0, and the perspective of Bangladesh, the value is 0.004 mg/L. Sulphate rate in the Dhaka WASA tap water is 0.4 mg/L. The reference value of WHO is 0, and the reference value for Bangladesh is 400 mg/L. Phosphorus rate of the tap water of Dhaka WASA is in a suitable level. 0.5 mg/L Phosphorus is found in the tap water where the reference rate of WHO and Bangladesh is 0 and 6 mg/L, respectively. In the case of Lead, the reference value of WHO and for Bangladesh is 0, where 0.012 mg/L Lead is being found in the tap water supplied by Dhaka WASA.
Discussion
Opportunistic waterborne pathogens include Mycobacterium avium complex, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Aeromonas hydrophila that can infect immune-compromised groups such as infants, adults, pregnant women and people with underlying medical conditions (cancer, HIV/AIDS etc). M. avium causes pulmonary, soft tissue and lymph node infections (Tortoli, 2009). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia causes respiratory infection in cystic fibrosis patients. Aeromonas hydrophila is an enteric pathogen infecting children and immunocompromised people (Maniet al., 1995). The aquatic biofilms have also been implicated in spread of drug-resistance genes (Talukdaret al., 2013) had shown presence of extended spectrum beta-lactam (ESBL) E. coli and QnrS elements for quinolone resistance from tap water in Dhaka city. Biofilm microbes also produce metabolites and components that change the quality of drinking water. Aspergillus spores are allergenic (Lowet al., 2011). The odor in tap water often results from dimethyl polysulphides, produced by Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium, Aeromonas, and Penicillium (Schulz & Dickschat, 2007) All these information stress on the development of robust and sensitive analytical techniques for evaluation of water quality as well as revised maintenance procedures that would help reduce formation of biofilms inside municipal water distribution pipes.
Over the last decade, the original report of microbiological analysis of tap water from Bangladesh mentioned isolating viable cells of coliforms and E. coli (Uddinet al., 2018). Klebsiella, Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, Aeromonas, and fungi, literature search on interaction of each pair of these microorganisms in a dual-species interaction helps to construct a hypothetical network of microbes in the water supplied by WASA. Aeromonas hydrophila showed positive interaction with Salmonella spp and Listeria monocytogenes (Allen & Poppe, 2002) but is inhibited by Pseudomonas aeruginosa at the planktonic phase of biofilm development (Lynch & Robertson, 2008). It has been found that live bacteria in more than 60% of the sampled tap water, which exceeds the Bangladesh Standards (BDS 1240:2001) for the microbiological quality of water. The Bangladesh Department of Public Health and Engineering (DPHE) has set different set of standards for potable water in Bangladesh, which vary from the universal standards set by the World Health Organization (WHO) in many parameters. Coliforms and E. coli are frequently reported in supply water (Acharjee, 2011; Mahmud, 2019) had reported finding E. coli, Klebsiella, Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, Aeromonas, and fungi from supply water, indicating that these bacteria and molds survive disinfection procedures. When taken together with the quality of raw water with higher concentration of Iron and Arsenic, we find factors limiting certain kinds of microbes in the distribution system. If we summarize the parameters reported from independent original studies, we can set the parameters of the supply water within the reported ranges. The pH of the natural water varies between 7–8, and the dissolved Oxygen ranges between 3–5 mg/L. The conductivity of the waters is 1158 μS/cm, much higher than the reference value for natural waters (Cole, 1982). The turbidity of the water is 1.1 NTU. The nitrate concentrate was 8.5 mg/L, closer to the upper limit of nitrate concentration (Acharjee, 2011). The Iron concentration was 0.05 mg/L, and phosphate and sulphate concentrations were 4.4 mg/L and 9 mg/L, respectively. The tap water for domestic use contained 0.02 mg/L of residual Chlorine (DPHE, 2010).
According to Zhouet al.(2020) the turbidity, ammonia concentration, nitrate content, and total organic Carbon content of the water inside the supply system influence the nature and extent of biofilm formation. Keet al.(2023) reported that the seasonal cycling of the biofilms inside the pipes correlated with seasonal temperature fluctuations. Bacteria that survive and develop biofilms under these conditions would be E. coli, Shigella, Vibrio, Klebsiella, Salmonella, Legionella pneumophila, Flavobacterium, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Nitrospira, Actinobacterium, Acidobacterium, Aeromonas, Sphingobacterium, Mycobacterium avium, Bacteroidium, Clostridia, Spirochaetes, Acremonium, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Microbacterium, Stenotrophomonas (Amendet al., 2013; Sanders, 1997).
Temperature, pH, conductivity, turbidity, dissolved Oxygen, type, and amounts of minerals, total organic Carbon, total Nitrogen, and biological/ chemical oxygen demands are the non-biologic parameters that set the limits for microbial life (Moazeniet al., 2013). The microbes form and thrive in a biofilm through biomass transfer from the organic Carbon and microbial growth on any solid support. These studies carried out between 2002 and 2017 in Europe, the US, Australia, China, Korea, and Brazil show varied types of microbial populations in biofilms (Morgan & Davies, 1999). The summer temperature in Europe and North America is around 15 °C to 25 °C, and the natural population of the surface waters is diverse genera of bacteria, fungi, and molds (Leeuwen, 2000). The total organic carbon (TOC) content was stated to be 8.5 mg/L in one of the reports (Proshad, 2021). The water distribution pipes are composed of a wide range of materials depending on the soil type, depth, water pressure, flow and retention pattern, the intended life of the pipes, etc. While UV radiation does not produce residual effect, chlorination is allowed to leave a threshold of 5 mg/L residual free chlorine so that any remaining pathogens are gradually killed on their way to the receiving end.
Conclusion
The multi-faceted problem of biofilms inside the municipal water distribution pipe has not yet been addressed in Bangladesh. Microbial interactions subject urban consumers to an even larger threat of an antimicrobial resistance epidemic. The incidences of water-borne infections and occasional deterioration in the quality of supply waters (odor, discoloration) call for cutting-edge, in-line, real-time monitoring facilities with prompt interventions (Zimmermannet al., 2014). Biological active Carbon (BAC) filters, granular active carbon (GAC) filters, UV lights, contact chlorine treatment, and engineered storage and distribution might prove useful in improving water quality and safety.
References
-
Acharjee, M. (2011). Microbiological study on supply water and treated water in Dhaka City. Stamford Journal of Microbiology, 1(1), 42–45. Ahmed, K. M. (2021). Chapter 31-Challenges of sustainable ground-water development and management in Bangladesh: Vision 2050. In Global groundwater, source, scarcity, sustainability, security, and solutions 2021 (pp. 425–438). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818172-0.00031-1.
Google Scholar
1
-
Allen, KJ., & Poppe, C. (2002 Winter). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of food animal isolates of Salmonella with reduced sensitivity to ciprofloxacin. Microbial Drug Resistance, 8(4), 375– 383. https://doi.org/10.1089/10766290260469651.
Google Scholar
2
-
American Public Health Association Standard Methods for Measurement of Water and Wastewater (1992). 18th ed. 9–21. www.issc.org/Data/Sites/1/media/2022-lab-updates/pages-from-9221-18th-edition.pdf.
Google Scholar
3
-
Amend, B, Bedke, J, Khalil, M, Siebert, DK (2013). Prolonged percutaneous SNM testing does not cause infection-related explanation. BJU International, 111(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11263.x.
Google Scholar
4
-
Arora, N. K., Fatima, T., Mishra, I., Verma, M., Mishra, J., & Mishra, V. (2018). Environmental sustainability: Challenges and viable solutions. Environmental Sustainability, 1(4), 309–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-018-00038-w.
Google Scholar
5
-
Bailey, E. S., Beetsch, N., Wait, D. A., Oza, H. H., Ronnie, N., & Sobsey, M. D. (2021). Methods, protocols, guidance and standards for performance evaluation for point-of-use water treatment technologies: History, current status, future needs and directions. Water, 13(8), 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081094.
Google Scholar
6
-
Bitton, G. (2014). Microbiology of Drinking Water: Production and Distribution. Florida: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
7
-
Cole, S. (1982). A review of fundamental physical and chemical properties of water for human consumption. South Carolina Public Health Bulletin, 8(2), 16–23.
Google Scholar
8
-
Department of Public Health Engineering, Government of Bangladesh. Technical information management standard. (2016). https://dphe.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/dphe.portal.gov.bd/page/dae8f66c_b32b_4fd3_a48e_bf3add90e1a5/389bd05c4aa9c89ad37cb8fd92bda365.pdf .
Google Scholar
9
-
Department of Public Health Engineering Official Website for Assessment of Quality of Water. (2010). https://dphe.gov.bd/site/page/15fa0d7b-11f1-45c0-a684-10a543376873/%E0%A6%AA%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%B0-%E0%A6%97%E0%A7%81%E0%A6%A3%E0%A6%97%E0%A6%A4-%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%B0-%E0%A6%AA%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%AF%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%9F%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B0.
Google Scholar
10
-
Edberg, S. C. E. R. (2000). Escherichia coli: The best biological drinking water indicator for public health protection. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 106S–116S.
Google Scholar
11
-
Guardabassi, L., Petersen, A., Olsen, J. E., & Dalsgaard, A. (1998). Antibiotic resistance in acinetobacter spp. isolated from sewers receiving waste effluent from a hospital and a pharmaceutical plant. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64(9), 3499–3502.
Google Scholar
12
-
Hurtado-McCormick, S., Sánchez, L., Martínez, J., Calderón, C., Calvo, D., Narváez, M., Groot, H., Susa, M. R. (2016). Fungi in biofilms of a drinking water network: Occurrence, diversity and mycotoxins approach. Water Supply, 16(4), 905–914. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2016.024.
Google Scholar
13
-
Khan, T. A. (2016). Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority: Performance and Challenges. Dhaka: Dhaka WASA.
Google Scholar
14
-
Ke, Y., Sun, W., Chen, X., Zhu, Y., Guo, X., Yan, W., et al. (2023). Seasonality determines the variations of biofilm microbiome and antibiotic resistome in a pilot-scale chlorinated drinking water distribution system deciphered by metagenome assembly. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(31), 11430–11441. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01980.
Google Scholar
15
-
Leeuwen, F. X. V. (2000). Safe drinking water: The toxicologist’s approach. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 38(1 Suppl), S51–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-6915(99)00140-4.
Google Scholar
16
-
Low, S. Y., Dannemiller, K., Yao, M., Yamamoto, N., & Peccia, J. (July 2011). The allergenicity of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia is influenced by growth temperature. Fungal Biology, 115(7), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2011.03.006.
Google Scholar
17
-
Lynch, AS., & Robertson, JT. (2008). Bacterial and fungal biofilm infections. Annual Review of Medicine, 59, 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.59.110106.132000.
Google Scholar
18
-
Mahmud, Z. H. (2019). Occurrence of Escherichia coli and faecal coliforms in drinking water at source and household point-of-use in Rohingya camps. Bangladesh Gut Pathogens, 11(1), e52.
Google Scholar
19
-
Mani, S., Sadigh, M., & Andriole, V. (1995). Clinical spectrum of aeromonas hydrophila infections: Report of 11 cases in a community hospital and review. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice, 4(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019048-199503000-00001.
Google Scholar
20
-
Md. Sirajul Islam, M. H. -U. -Z. (2020). Waterborne pathogens: review of outbreaks in developing nations. In M. H. -U. -Z. Md. Sirajul Islam (Eds.), Waterborne pathogens; detection and treatment (pp. 43–56). Dhaka: icddr’b.
Google Scholar
21
-
Moazeni, M., Atefi, M., Ebrahimi, A., Razmjoo, P., & Dastjerdi, M. V. (2013). Evaluation of chemical and microbiological quality in 21 brands of Iranian bottled drinking waters in 2012: A comparison study on label and real contents. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 469590, e4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/469590.
Google Scholar
22
-
Morgan, F. L. J. N. (1988). Thermal destruction of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in human milk. Journal of Food Protection, 132–136.
Google Scholar
23
-
Morgan, J. J., and Davies, S. H. R. (1999). Linking microscopic and macroscopic data for heterogeneous reactions illustrated by the oxidation of manganese (II) at mineral surfaces. Geochimica et cosmochimica acta 62, 361–364.
Google Scholar
24
-
Percival, J. T. S. L. (1999). Potable water and biofilms: A review of the public health implications. Biofouling, 99–115.
Google Scholar
25
-
Proshad, R. (2021). Appraisal of heavy metal toxicity in surface water with human health risk by a novel approach: a study on an urban river in vicinity to industrial areas of Bangladesh. Toxin Reviews, 40(4), 803–819.
Google Scholar
26
-
Sanders, W. E. S. C. Jr. (1997). Enterobacter spp.: Pathogens poised to flourish at the turn of the century. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 220–241.
Google Scholar
27
-
Schulz, S., & Dickschat, J. S. (2007). Bacterial volatiles: The smell of small organisms. Natural Product Reports, 24(4), 814–842. https://doi.org/10.1039/b507392h.
Google Scholar
28
-
Talukdar, P. K., Rahman, M., Rahman, M., Nabi, A., Islam, Z., Hoque, M. M., Endtz, H. P., Islam, M. A. (2013). Antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors and genetic diversity of escherichia coli isolates from household water supply in Dhaka, Bangladesh. PLoS One, 8(4), e61090. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061090.
Google Scholar
29
-
Tortoli, E. (2009). Clinical manifestations of nontuberculous mycobacteria infections. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 15(10), 906–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03014.x.
Google Scholar
30
-
Uddin, M. A., Siddiqua, M. A., & Akter, M. S. (2020). Isolation and quantification of indicator and pathogenic microorganisms along with their drug resistance traits from bottled and jar water samples within Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Stamford Journal of Microbiology, 9(1), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.3329/sjm.v9i1.45651.
Google Scholar
31
-
Zhou, Y., Li, R., Guo, B., Zhang, L., Zou, X., Xia, S., Liu, Y. (2020). Greywater treatment using an oxygen-based membrane biofilm reactor: Formation of dynamic multifunctional biofilm for organics and nitrogen removal. Chemical Engineering Journal, 386, 123989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123989.
Google Scholar
32
-
Zimmermann, J., Schmidt, H., Loessner, M. J., Weiss, A. (2014). Development of a rapid detection system for opportunistic pathogenic Cronobacter spp. in powdered milk products. Food Microbiology, 42, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.02.010.
Google Scholar
33
-
Zottola, E. A., & Sasahara, K. C. (1994). Microbial biofilms in the food processing industry–should they be a concern? International Journal of Food Microbiology, 23(2), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(94)90047-7.
Google Scholar
34
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Syeda Tasneem Towhid,
Md. Jubayer Hossain,
Md. Atik Shariar Sammo,
Sumona Akter,
Perception of Students on Antibiotic Resistance and Prevention: An Online, Community-Based Case Study from Dhaka, Bangladesh , European Journal of Biology and Biotechnology: Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022) -
Farhana Afroze,
Md. Zahid Hassan,
Md. Zahid Hasan Rana,
Shilpi Akter,
Md. Imran Hossen,
Syeda Tasneem Towhid,
Efficacy of Benzylkonium and Clorhexidine against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas Sp. from Dhaka, Bangladesh , European Journal of Biology and Biotechnology: Vol. 3 No. 4 (2022)